Lenovo 10A6S0TG00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 10A6S0TG00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140126
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '24 at 22:03
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 205
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 546
59% 467 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
AMD(1002 0B0D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1201 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 26.1
Parallax 28.9
15% 24.5 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 24.6
Splatting 20.9
19% 23.5 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 311 312 321 291 321 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 371
Write 316
Mixed 162
SusWrite 310
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 31.4
112% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 189
171% 260 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 101%
Toshiba THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
476GB free
Firmware: 410557LA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 743 760 760 771 794 701 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 965
Write 807
Mixed 643
SusWrite 755
178% 792 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 43.4
136% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 863
DQ Write 598
DQ Mixed 663
513% 708 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 160%
Great: 235%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 KHX1600C10D3/8G Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.4% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 19.6
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 23" 1280 720 SAM07D4 SMS23A350H
Typical 10A6S0TG00 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Lenovo 10A6S0TG00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback