Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory21.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181130
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '24 at 21:26
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 72.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 225
75% 137 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 670
63% 524 Pts
64-Core 877
54% 877 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
MSI(1462 C75C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 111
Parallax 125
98% 119 fps
MRender 169
Gravity 121
Splatting 104
104% 131 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 100%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR020 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 107 35 68 113 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1,614
Write 1,351
Mixed 1,150
SusWrite 128
236% 1,061 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 43.1
155% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 684
DQ Write 90.2
DQ Mixed 173
181% 316 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 137%
Great: 295%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
88GB free
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 424 421 440 432 427 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 497
Write 449
Mixed 347
SusWrite 428
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 35.5
4K Mixed 28.4
103% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 72.4
DQ Mixed 133
111% 167 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 124%
WD Blue SA510 2.5 1000GB
471GB free
Firmware: 52020100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 423 299 173 262 271 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 462
Write 440
Mixed 428
SusWrite 307
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 30.3
103% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 63
DQ Mixed 116
108% 176 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
494GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 144 141 146 143 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 164
Write 142
Mixed 73.4
SusWrite 144
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 109%
SABRENT 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 182 186 187 182 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 179
Mixed 78
SusWrite 185
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1
238% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB
187GB free, PID 4001
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 103 108 107 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 422
Write 186
Mixed 163
SusWrite 111
255% 221 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 20.4
4K Mixed 17.3
1,339% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 19.9
DQ Write 40.1
DQ Mixed 25
2,288% 28.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 152%
Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.7% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 25.3
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 24
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 95.4
42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 55: 0P 5R 7G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
27% 30% 50 212 58 144 27" 2560 1380 ACR06CF VG270U P
History: Score 27: 0P 1R 4G 10B | Score 55: 0P 5R 7G 9B
Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,888 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $794
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback