Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte B365 M AORUS ELITE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '24 at 20:29
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU 66%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500-$139
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 527
63% 488 Pts
64-Core 588
36% 588 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.7% Above average
Lighting 70.9
Reflection 102
Parallax 69.2
58% 80.7 fps
MRender 58.2
Gravity 66.6
Splatting 54.9
49% 59.9 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 401 23 12 13 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 468
Write 413
Mixed 396
SusWrite 141
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 21.1
98% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 36.4
83% 165 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
397GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 137 136 136 136 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80% Excellent
Read 151
Write 138
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 128
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
170% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
34.5% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 10.6
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 10.9
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 165 27" 1280 720 ACR074F KG271 P
Typical GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 2,237 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $461
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback