Asus TUF GAMING B660-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B660-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221013
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '24 at 14:37
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600K-$260
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 80.8
1-Core 212
2-Core 424
123% 239 Pts
4-Core 833
8-Core 1,449
138% 1141 Pts
64-Core 2,492
154% 2,492 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 118%
Great: 128%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4889
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
8.96% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 11.1
8% 12.2 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 14.3
Splatting 11.1
10% 13.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.96%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SSD 500GB
251GB free
Firmware: ECFA12.b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1365 1236 766 757 761 762 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,092
Write 1,281
Mixed 1,097
SusWrite 941
249% 1,103 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 53.2
228% 94.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,420
DQ Write 1,550
DQ Mixed 1,231
996% 1,400 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 236%
Great: 240%
Kioxia-exceria PRO SSD 1TB
258GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFA10.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,045
Write 3,824
Mixed 2555
634% 2,808 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 307
4K Mixed 100
360% 151 MB/s
DQ Read 2,392
DQ Write 1,979
DQ Mixed 2,242
1,664% 2,205 MB/s
Poor: 228% Great: 460%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Essencore Limited KD48GU880-36A180C 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.2% Excellent
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 30.8
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 24.2
74% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 34.1" 2560 1009 GSM7714 LG HDR WFHD
Typical TUF GAMING B660-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 3,845 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B660-PLUS WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $538
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback