Acer Aspire A515-48M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive353% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire A515-48M  (all builds)
MotherboardBC Kelly_BCU
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230119
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '24 at 18:28
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 66.9
1-Core 159
2-Core 307
93% 178 Pts
4-Core 593
8-Core 1,121
102% 857 Pts
64-Core 1,201
74% 1,201 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 1688) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.42.02
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Lighting 24.2
Reflection 19.2
Parallax 32.9
20% 25.4 fps
MRender 15.6
Gravity 27.2
Splatting 21.9
18% 21.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014 512GB
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73101100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2280 2378 2351 2347 2290 1034 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
353% Outstanding
Read 2,528
Write 2,504
Mixed 2075
SusWrite 2,113
519% 2,305 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 67.2
238% 82.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,266
DQ Write 968
DQ Mixed 1,080
818% 1,104 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 353%
Great: 448%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown K4UBE3D4AB-MGCL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 27
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 26.8
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 12: 0P 2R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
12% 20% 20 213 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUOE997
Typical Aspire A515-48M Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Acer Aspire A515-48M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback