NCIX OBSX99-R4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemNCIX OBSX99-R4  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X99-E WS/USB 3.1
Memory89.8 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '24 at 06:59
Run Duration83 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v3
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 80.6
2-Core 171
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 687
63% 527 Pts
64-Core 919
57% 919 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
158% Outstanding
Lighting 212
Reflection 202
Parallax 242
173% 219 fps
MRender 261
Gravity 226
Splatting 159
170% 216 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 158%
Great: 174%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX Predator AHCI PCIe M.2 240GB-$141
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C4005T2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,032
Write 723
Mixed 473
164% 742 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 31.2
110% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 111
150% 273 MB/s
Poor: 84% Great: 159%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR128GX4M8C3000C16 6x16GB
6 of 8 slots used
96GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
92.7% Outstanding
MC Read 41.6
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 33
102% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 20.6
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 21.5" 1280 720 SAM09B7 S22C200
Typical OBSX99-R4 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

System: NCIX OBSX99-R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $582
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback