Notebook PD5x_7xPNP_PNR_PNN_PNT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemNotebook PD5x_7xPNP_PNR_PNN_PNT  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook PD5x_7xPNP_PNR_PNN_PNT
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '24 at 22:42
Run Duration80 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Memory 60.8
1-Core 181
2-Core 351
101% 198 Pts
4-Core 647
8-Core 1,131
107% 889 Pts
64-Core 1,945
120% 1,945 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 91%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 67F5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1785 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 188
Parallax 165
141% 175 fps
MRender 175
Gravity 132
Splatting 126
116% 144 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 126%
Great: 135%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD Blue SN570 1TB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,112
Write 2,260
Mixed 1,947
471% 2,106 MB/s
4K Read 65.1
4K Write 211
4K Mixed 88.9
324% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,391
DQ Write 1,060
DQ Mixed 1,173
892% 1,208 MB/s
Poor: 139% Great: 305%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Gold Key Co Ltd NMSO416E82-3200E 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 31.5
94% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 33.6
SC Mixed 23.7
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 57: 0P 5R 10G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
57% 59% 29 500 388 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical PD5x_7xPNP_PNR_PNN_PNT Builds (Compare 114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Notebook PD5x_7xPNP_PNR_PNN_PNT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback