Notebook PC5x_7xHP_HR_HS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive313% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNotebook PC5x_7xHP_HR_HS  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook PC5x_7xHP_HR_HS
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210913
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '24 at 17:07
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 60.6
1-Core 131
2-Core 246
78% 146 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 698
70% 568 Pts
64-Core 853
53% 853 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 65F1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1934
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.59% Terrible
Lighting 8.7
Reflection 14.6
Parallax 10.2
7% 11.2 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 9.3
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.59%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
2TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2030 2041 2034 1988 1475 1471 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
330% Outstanding
Read 2,263
Write 2,053
Mixed 1,750
SusWrite 1,840
444% 1,976 MB/s
4K Read 58.1
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 78.8
258% 89.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,170
DQ Write 915
DQ Mixed 1022
770% 1,036 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 330%
Great: 435%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1572 1471 1488 1461 1467 1483 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
313% Outstanding
Read 2,302
Write 2,053
Mixed 1,664
SusWrite 1,490
421% 1,877 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 83.3
282% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,093
DQ Write 802
DQ Mixed 934
702% 943 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 313%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GE2666C18S2 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
61.3% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 21.6
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 13.3
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 17.3" 1920 1009 LGD065B
Typical PC5x_7xHP_HR_HS Builds (Compare 200 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Notebook PC5x_7xHP_HR_HS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback