HP Laptop 17-cn3xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 17-cn3xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8BBA
Memory50.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230718
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '24 at 16:27
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1355U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 61.9
1-Core 172
2-Core 348
99% 194 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 594
71% 547 Pts
64-Core 736
46% 736 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
HP(103C 8BBA) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 20.7
Parallax 19.1
12% 18.3 fps
MRender 24.3
Gravity 27.4
Splatting 0.1
12% 17.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AGI2T0GIMAI298 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC2S038E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1280 1071 774 527 520 420 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 1,708
Write 1,183
Mixed 1,111
SusWrite 765
266% 1,192 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 59
238% 90.7 MB/s
DQ Read 975
DQ Write 954
DQ Mixed 967
726% 965 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 230%
Great: 268%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.M16FE 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 36.1
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 38.5
SC Mixed 27.5
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 100%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 0P 0R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 14% 21 96 8 60 17.3" 1600 829 BOE0953
Typical Laptop 17-cn3xxx Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Laptop 17-cn3xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback