Acer Aspire A315-24P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-24P  (all builds)
MotherboardMDC Herbag_MDU
Memory0.3 GB free of 4 GB
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230628
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '24 at 12:30
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 7320U Graphics
FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 47.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 219
66% 126 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 501
57% 444 Pts
64-Core 500
31% 500 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 1654) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 22.20.24.01
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
5.51% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 11.7
5% 9.43 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 7
Splatting 6.1
6% 7.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.51%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-256G-1014 256GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73101100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1196 1210 1187 1215 907 359 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 1,303
Write 1,110
Mixed 1,182
SusWrite 1,012
259% 1,152 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 71.5
4K Mixed 49.6
167% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 961
DQ Write 978
DQ Mixed 879
685% 939 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 209%
Great: 312%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F512M32D2DR-031 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.5% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 24.8
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 20.4
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 177
23% 177 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO81EC
Typical Aspire A315-24P Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-24P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback