Pcspecialist Ionico II 17

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemPcspecialist Ionico II 17  (all builds)
MotherboardTongFang GM7TN7P
Memory47.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210709
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '24 at 19:10
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
68% Good
Memory 56.2
1-Core 128
2-Core 246
76% 143 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 642
67% 535 Pts
64-Core 859
53% 859 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 68%
Great: 94%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D05 1147) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.69% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 13.9
Parallax 10.9
7% 11.1 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 10.1
9% 11.6 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.69%
Great: 9%
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop)
Device(1D05 1147) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 173
Parallax 150
132% 162 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 118
Splatting 116
112% 141 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 120%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP400 2TB
900GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM53.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1409 370 274 257 410 393 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 1007
Write 1,344
Mixed 1037
SusWrite 519
220% 977 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 99.8
4K Mixed 52.6
175% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 692
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 530
376% 491 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 148%
Great: 382%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X32GE2666C18S2 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60.6% Good
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 23
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 12.1
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 165 17.2" 1280 720 BOE0977
Typical Ionico II 17 Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Pcspecialist Ionico II 17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback