Gigabyte Z390 UD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 UD  (all builds)
Memory55.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '24 at 00:03
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$271
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Memory 84.2
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
93% 172 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 1059
97% 812 Pts
64-Core 1,553
96% 1,553 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 4125 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 178
Parallax 180
142% 178 fps
MRender 205
Gravity 160
Splatting 0.2
86% 122 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 119%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 170 157 191 138 190 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 338
Write 406
Mixed 168
SusWrite 173
61% 271 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 42
152% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 102
143% 265 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 111%
Wd_black SN750 2TB
195GB free
Firmware: 112000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2158 1758 1513 1518 1515 1226 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
293% Outstanding
Read 1,933
Write 2,000
Mixed 1,689
SusWrite 1,615
408% 1,809 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 63.8
226% 85.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,243
DQ Write 894
DQ Mixed 1,060
794% 1,065 MB/s
Poor: 190%
This bench: 293%
Great: 347%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
824GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 475 476 467 454 473 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 483
Mixed 468
SusWrite 472
109% 484 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 99.2
4K Mixed 59.4
196% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 355
267% 356 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 126%
Great: 137%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
593GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 175 176 175 175 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 185
Mixed 71
SusWrite 176
114% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 107%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-32GTZN 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 25.2
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 36.5
SC Mixed 24.8
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 120 72.3" 1707 897 GSMC0C8 LG TV SSCR2
Typical GA-Z390 UD Builds (Compare 11,974 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 UD - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $735
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback