Gigabyte GA-Z590 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 173%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 174%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics160% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive334% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z590 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210316
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '24 at 20:39
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700K-$231
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 172
2-Core 345
109% 203 Pts
4-Core 666
8-Core 1,184
111% 925 Pts
64-Core 1,639
101% 1,639 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$449
Gigabyte(1458 408E) ≥ 4GB; aorus
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
160% Outstanding
Lighting 236
Reflection 221
Parallax 227
192% 228 fps
MRender 246
Gravity 162
Splatting 133
142% 180 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 160%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2052 2052 2079 2084 2087 2076 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
334% Outstanding
Read 2352
Write 2,068
Mixed 1,256
SusWrite 2,072
435% 1,937 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 61.8
212% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,533
DQ Write 642
DQ Mixed 274
418% 816 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 334%
Great: 477%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
229GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1346 305 305 306 305 306 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 2,288
Write 1,464
Mixed 1,248
SusWrite 479
304% 1,370 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 57.2
189% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 964
DQ Write 626
DQ Mixed 798
595% 796 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 215%
Great: 280%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
931GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 177 178 178 178 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 175
Mixed 109
SusWrite 178
122% 166 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
229% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 108%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 45.4
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 32.7
112% 39.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 41.2
SC Mixed 34.1
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 58.9
68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 110%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 360 24.5" 1280 720 ACR08F5 X25
Typical GA-Z590 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 6,263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z590 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $836
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback