Asus PRIME H410M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H410M-K (all builds)
Memory	2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201019
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 18 '24 at 12:44
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10105F 14,843 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 86.4 1-Core 103 2-Core 190 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 506 51% 416 Pts	64-Core 526 33% 526 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.23 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.3% Poor	Lighting 31.7 Reflection 36 Parallax 33.8 26% 33.8 fps	MRender 34.3 Gravity 33.9 Splatting 23.5 24% 30.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900BB3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 191 63 31 31 31 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	66.3% Good	Read 368 Write 396 Mixed 298 SusWrite 83.5 64% 286 MB/s	4K Read 17.1 4K Write 64.7 4K Mixed 36.3 107% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 252 DQ Write 313 DQ Mixed 203 175% 256 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 91%
Jmicron Tech 120GB 151 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 37GB free Firmware: 1201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 95 98 54 63 79 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Read 381 Write 283 Mixed 298 SusWrite 112 60% 269 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 37.1 4K Mixed 25.7 97% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 140 113% 160 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
MAXSUN MSD48G26Q3 1x8GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 11 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 11.7 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	55	27	75	32"	1280 720	IPS0001

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H410M-K Builds (Compare 2,857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 59%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H410M-K

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	1,166x
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples	615x
Core i5-10400Intel $125Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	274x

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	332x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	249x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	228x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	151x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	137x
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	129x

RAM
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	170x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	58x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	49x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $366

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16