Biostar H81MHV3 3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar H81MHV3 3.0  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210915
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '24 at 10:35
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User LBN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 88.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 599
66% 522 Pts
64-Core 585
36% 585 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.4% Above average
Lighting 67.4
Reflection 74.8
Parallax 68.7
55% 70.3 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 71.7
Splatting 67.7
56% 68.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
458GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SHFK30.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 429 436 440 445 446 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 408
Write 319
Mixed 436
SusWrite 411
89% 393 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 88.2
4K Mixed 48.6
165% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 290
237% 337 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 109%
Great: 102%
Kingston SA400S37240G 960GB
407GB free
Firmware: SHFK30.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 434 445 448 451 450 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 414
Write 471
Mixed 440
SusWrite 417
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 48.9
166% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 289
236% 337 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 107%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
240GB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 165 165 164 162 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 88.5
Write 94.8
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 159
72% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
394GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 103 105 103 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 154
Write 103
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 104
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 9905471-074.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
57.1% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 16.5
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 18.1
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 18.9" 1280 720 VSC8724 VA1932 Series
Typical H81MHV3 3.0 Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H81MHV3 3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $363
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback