Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory21.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230824
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '24 at 09:53
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 80.8
1-Core 134
2-Core 266
88% 160 Pts
4-Core 537
8-Core 915
88% 726 Pts
64-Core 1,773
110% 1,773 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 193
Parallax 137
101% 151 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 187
Splatting 130
123% 153 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 107%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$198
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 780 326 291 287 282 278 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1,723
Write 793
Mixed 760
SusWrite 374
201% 912 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 54.7
172% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 963
DQ Write 632
DQ Mixed 763
578% 786 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 181%
Great: 302%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380
21GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 499
Write 479
Mixed 458
107% 479 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 87.1
4K Mixed 53.2
175% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 358
269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 85% Great: 133%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$370
242GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 466 464 472 475 472 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 450
Mixed 425
SusWrite 462
101% 446 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 50.5
171% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 358
270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 115%
Great: 137%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$198
27GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,354
Write 2,103
Mixed 1510
442% 1,989 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 69.4
223% 76.2 MB/s
DQ Read 918
DQ Write 430
DQ Mixed 758
540% 702 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 371%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380
349GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 463 461 468 472 467 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 467
Mixed 459
SusWrite 459
106% 469 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 48.4
169% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 357
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 61.3
MC Mixed 31.7
121% 42.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 11
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 106%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 240 24.5" 1280 720 SAM7275 Odyssey G40B
Typical ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING Builds (Compare 1,746 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING - $275

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,345
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback