Biostar TB250-BTC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar TB250-BTC  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171129
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '24 at 00:07
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500-$139
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 84.1
1-Core 122
2-Core 246
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 723
75% 603 Pts
64-Core 720
45% 720 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 2200 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.6% Average
Lighting 60.4
Reflection 58
Parallax 75.5
49% 64.6 fps
MRender 61.7
Gravity 66.7
Splatting 40.6
44% 56.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 128GB SSD 128GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1201A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 131 131 133 133 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 466
Write 129
Mixed 166
SusWrite 131
49% 223 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 84.3
4K Mixed 25
113% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 34
70% 140 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 99%
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
261GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 76 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 75.3
Write 69.1
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 76.6
50% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965669-019.A00G 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
45.3% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 13.5
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 14.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 26: 0P 4R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
26% 20% 41 195 33 60 18.5" 1280 720 SAM0564 SyncMaster
Typical TB250-BTC Builds (Compare 595 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

Motherboard: Biostar TB250-BTC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $216
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback