Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570T 7,298 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Memory 71.3 1-Core 83.6 2-Core 163 61% 106 Pts	4-Core 215 8-Core 240 30% 228 Pts	64-Core 237 15% 237 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 66%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000L7 256GB 4,594 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 178GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT09L6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 253 255 255 256 256 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	86% Excellent	Read 488 Write 257 Mixed 194 SusWrite 255 66% 299 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 68 4K Mixed 29.4 123% 43.2 MB/s	DQ Read 368 DQ Write 255 DQ Mixed 82.2 123% 235 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KVR16LS11/8 2x8GB 89 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	45.9% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 14.3 45% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 15.7 42% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 99.7 40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	56	75	0"	1280 720

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16