Dell XPS 17 9700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemDell XPS 17 9700  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 03CPGC
Memory51.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230925
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '24 at 18:44
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10885H
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 142
2-Core 242
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 776
73% 604 Pts
64-Core 1,321
82% 1,321 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Dell(1028 098F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.21% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 10
Parallax 8.7
5% 8.33 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 11.7
8% 9.93 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.21%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CT2000T50 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P8CR001 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1806 1935 901 247 1288 535 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 1,611
Write 2,145
Mixed 1639
SusWrite 1,119
368% 1,628 MB/s
4K Read 48.5
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 66
210% 70.7 MB/s
DQ Read 788
DQ Write 612
DQ Mixed 704
526% 702 MB/s
Poor: 228%
This bench: 230%
Great: 647%
Nvme PM981a SAMSUNG 2048GB
2TB free
Firmware: 15303229 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1896 1933 1934 1925 1583 1518 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 1,665
Write 1,880
Mixed 1,491
SusWrite 1,798
386% 1,708 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 62
197% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 846
DQ Write 641
DQ Mixed 735
552% 741 MB/s
Poor: 177%
This bench: 271%
Great: 344%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
998GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 133 129 134 139 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 79.7
Write 60.6
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 135
55% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.5
182% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 97%
WD Game Drive 5TB
2TB free, PID 262f
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 98 99 98 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 84.9
Write 95.2
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 98.3
117% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.7
241% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 66%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
1TB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 65 70 69 65 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 141
Write 134
Mixed 20
SusWrite 67.7
113% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
39% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.C16FF 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.8% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 23.2
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 23.3
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 17" 1280 720 SHP14D7
Typical XPS 17 9700 Builds (Compare 1,677 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 17 9700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback