MSI A320M PRO-VH (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics75.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-VH (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '24 at 18:26
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A10-8770 R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
44.7% Average
Memory 53.8
1-Core 66.3
2-Core 123
47% 81 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 200
28% 204 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$230
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Lighting 103
Reflection 83.7
Parallax 89.7
84% 92 fps
MRender 84.7
Gravity 72.4
Splatting 65.3
60% 74.1 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 78%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD_2.5"_TLC_512GB_InnovationIT 512GB
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 297 343 129 79 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 411
Write 204
Mixed 336
SusWrite 185
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 13.3
78% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 29.7
68% 137 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown INNO8G2400S 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.5% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 9.5
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 6.4
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 4: 0P 0R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
4% 9% 23 196 56 75 27" 1280 720 AUS27DA ASUS VY279
Typical A320M PRO-VH (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VH (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $168
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback