Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IHRB_FA506IHRB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IHRB_FA506IHRB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506IHRB
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '24 at 17:15
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 76.3
1-Core 133
2-Core 263
85% 158 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 771
81% 648 Pts
64-Core 946
58% 946 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 87%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 16ED) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
44.1% Average
Lighting 56
Reflection 73.8
Parallax 49.7
46% 59.8 fps
MRender 63.5
Gravity 48.3
Splatting 42.6
41% 51.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 45%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,302
Write 1117
Mixed 1,084
260% 1,168 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 51.5
169% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 795
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 638
444% 569 MB/s
Poor: 104% Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFRA32A.M4FEA Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 21.9
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 16.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 23.8" 1280 720 SAM71D9 LS24AG32x
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IHRB_FA506IHRB Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IHRB_FA506IHRB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback