Oegstone Q170M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	41.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Oegstone Q170M-C (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Q170M-C
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160317
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 17 '24 at 16:34
Run Duration	115 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	76.6% Very good	Memory 79.3 1-Core 117 2-Core 233 79% 143 Pts	4-Core 398 8-Core 634 63% 516 Pts	64-Core 630 39% 630 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% MSI(1462 8D92) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.52 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.3% Average	Lighting 53.1 Reflection 56.6 Parallax 46.8 43% 52.2 fps	MRender 40.9 Gravity 50.4 Splatting 45.6 38% 45.6 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 46%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-00004 256GB 878 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0300Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 247 252 253 254 255 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Read 417 Write 258 Mixed 196 SusWrite 251 62% 280 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 78.4 4K Mixed 29.4 130% 47.2 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 248 DQ Mixed 81.2 122% 234 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2Z3600C18 1x16GB 458 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 11.5 37% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 13.6 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 96.2 42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 68%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	56	170	27"	1280 720	HKC1012 GN03

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q170M-C Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: Oegstone Q170M-C

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	14x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	14x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	13x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	13x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	7x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	4x

SSD
Green 120GB (2016)WD $84Bench 53%, 21,990 samples	5x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x
MTFDDAK512MBF-1AN1ZABHA 512GBCrucialBench 92%, 1,497 samples	3x

RAM
CL16-18-18 D4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 83%, 16,678 samples	4x
9905678-023.A00G 2x8GBKingstonBench 67%, 2,792 samples	3x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 93%, 1,595 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $163

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16