Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GD_X571GD

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GD_X571GD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X571GD
Memory	6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20201217
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 17 '24 at 15:23
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 80.8 1-Core 117 2-Core 210 77% 136 Pts	4-Core 327 8-Core 455 49% 391 Pts	64-Core 479 30% 479 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 12FF) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6617 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.3% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 5.1 Parallax 6.4 0% 3.87 fps	MRender 8.5 Gravity 5.6 Splatting 9.6 7% 7.9 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 2.3% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$35 109,999 User benchmarks, average bench 244% 453GB free Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 967 868 833 844 821 798 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	171% Outstanding	Read 882 Write 1,192 Mixed 862 SusWrite 855 214% 948 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 82.4 4K Mixed 48.6 159% 55.4 MB/s	DQ Read 880 DQ Write 653 DQ Mixed 753 566% 762 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 171% Great: 297%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 409GB free (System drive) Firmware: AM0B3J SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 87 87 91 94 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 101 Write 95.2 Mixed 33.2 SusWrite 87.6 58% 79.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 12GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.9% Below average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 10.8 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 10.9 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 68%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	67	54	60	15.5"	1280 720	LGD0563

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GD_X571GD Builds (Compare 317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GD_X571GD

CPU
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	153x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	101x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	63x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	179x
GeForce GTX 1050NvidiaBench 24%, 2,418 samples	138x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	171x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	45x
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples	6x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	104x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBSamsungBench 63%, 849 samples	44x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GBSamsungBench 74%, 928 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16