Biostar H410MH

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Biostar H410MH (all builds)
Memory	26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200603
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 17 '24 at 14:50
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10700F-$180 44,448 User benchmarks, average bench 93% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Memory 91.1 1-Core 104 2-Core 209 78% 135 Pts	4-Core 418 8-Core 812 73% 615 Pts	64-Core 1,094 68% 1,094 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% MSI(1462 8D92) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Lighting 59.7 Reflection 60.3 Parallax 51.5 49% 57.2 fps	MRender 42.9 Gravity 53.5 Splatting 48.8 40% 48.4 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSDPR-CL100-240-G3 240GB 1,084 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 123GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0924A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 39 20 41 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 478 Write 62.5 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 28.3 31% 148 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 14.7 4K Mixed 13 60% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 92.9 DQ Write 70.5 DQ Mixed 1.1 23% 54.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 89%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$100 1,047 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 541GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 85 85 83 86 84 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	41.2% Average	Read 60 Write 77.8 Mixed 52 SusWrite 83.3 50% 68.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/32GX 1x31GB 1,476 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1 of 4 slots used 31GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	44.2% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 12.6 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 15.7 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 67.1 60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	55	60	23.5"	1280 720	SAM0D2C C24F390

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H410MH Builds (Compare 983 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar H410MH

CPU
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples	302x
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	290x
Core i3-10100Intel $94Bench 80%, 24,563 samples	104x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	141x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 37,718 samples	71x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	67x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	45x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	28x
Burst 240GBPatriotBench 73%, 26,886 samples	24x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	26x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	21x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $253

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16