Medion H81H3-EM2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion H81H3-EM2  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H81H3-EM2
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141029
Uptime6 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '24 at 09:53
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 167
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 306
40% 301 Pts
64-Core 295
18% 295 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Elitegroup(1019 1026) 1GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 15.5
14% 16.4 fps
MRender 22.1
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 14.9
15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 160 169 166 158 158 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.2% Good
Read 247
Write 213
Mixed 178
SusWrite 162
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 55.9
4K Mixed 29.6
108% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 102
98% 155 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 110%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
848GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 180 179 180 182 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 179
Mixed 88.8
SusWrite 179
114% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 103%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F4G64CB88D7N-DI 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
29.1% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.4
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 8.1
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 0P 1R 1G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 15% 67 214 57 60 18.5" 1280 720 ACI19E4 ASUS VH192
Typical H81H3-EM2 Builds (Compare 541 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Medion H81H3-EM2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback