Asrock B450M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221020
Uptime3 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '24 at 06:54
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 56.4
1-Core 154
2-Core 274
85% 161 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 921
85% 713 Pts
64-Core 1,912
118% 1,912 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
XFX(1EAE 7901) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
138% Outstanding
Lighting 190
Reflection 260
Parallax 601
154% 350 fps
MRender 308
Gravity 249
Splatting 0.2
132% 186 fps
Poor: 216%
This bench: 138%
Great: 293%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0C 1TB
436GB free
Firmware: 211210WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1315 697 777 732 708 735 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,062
Write 1,207
Mixed 981
SusWrite 827
230% 1,019 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 88.2
4K Mixed 31.3
130% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 936
DQ Write 726
DQ Mixed 898
654% 854 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 169%
Great: 269%
Kingston RBU-SNS8100S3256GD 256GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM06.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 54 151 38 65 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
43% Average
Read 381
Write 302
Mixed 207
SusWrite 74.3
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 18.6
4K Mixed 14.2
52% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 10.7
50% 112 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43%
Great: 75%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$165
393GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 338 393 349 354 353 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 311
Write 363
Mixed 298
SusWrite 357
75% 332 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 35.3
121% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 369
278% 371 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 136%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
851GB free
Firmware: HP16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 105 90 116 39 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 19.2
Write 43
Mixed 11.7
SusWrite 89.8
30% 40.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
105% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
60.5% Good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 22.1
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 13
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 55 165 27" 2560 1377 LEN65EE LEN Y27q-20
Typical B450M Pro4 Builds (Compare 9,038 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4 - $79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback