TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 82SA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82SA  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit färger,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '24 at 02:40
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 58
1-Core 108
2-Core 199
66% 122 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 434
48% 381 Pts
64-Core 700
43% 700 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑
This bench: 59%
 Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 3AF6) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
9.43% Terrible
Lighting 12.5
Reflection 21.5
Parallax 17.1
10% 17 fps
MRender 17.8
Gravity 15.2
Splatting 0.4
8% 11.1 fps
Poor: 10% ↑
This bench: 9.43%
 Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNW010TZL 1TB
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C01C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 964 92 236 224 147 322 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 1,336
Write 185
Mixed 1,078
SusWrite 331
162% 732 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 56.2
192% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 449
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 392
280% 363 MB/s
Poor: 175% ↑
This bench: 149%
 Great: 403%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
72.6% Very good
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 26.4
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 18.9
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 72.6%
 Great: 86%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 2: 0P 0R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
2% 7% 30 212 57 165 16" 1280 720 LEN9153
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 82SA Builds (Compare 642 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82SA

CPU
Core i5-12500HIntelBench 94%, 11,588 samples202x
Core i7-12650HIntelBench 96%, 16,339 samples186x
Core i5-12450HIntelBench 89%, 9,550 samples147x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 11%, 18,986 samples199x
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples157x
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples131x
SSD
INTEL SSDPEKNW512GZL 512GBNvmeBench 186%, 1,776 samples173x
Micron MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBNvmeBench 165%, 1,753 samples83x
KBG50ZNT512G LS KIOXIA 512GBNvmeBench 223%, 343 samples75x
RAM
M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 38,732 samples195x
HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN 2x8GBHynixBench 66%, 21,689 samples94x
M471A1G44BB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 64%, 6,868 samples60x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback