Positivo POS-EIH61CE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive4.27% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo POS-EIH61CE  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-EIH61CE
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1776 x 1000 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121130
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '24 at 19:49
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1220 V2-$305
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 87.6
2-Core 176
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 296
39% 291 Pts
64-Core 316
20% 316 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0200Sc10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 40 40 17 6.8 24 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
4.27% Terrible
Read 16.6
Write 104
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 30.3
9% 39.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.9
6% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 4.27%
Great: 95%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
463GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 189 167 147 177 172 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 180
Mixed 37
SusWrite 174
105% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
132% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 104%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-034.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 15.2
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 0 0 60 0" 1280 720
Typical POS-EIH61CE Builds (Compare 376 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-EIH61CE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback