Fujitsu LIFEBOOK P770

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive27% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK P770  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB20F
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100414
Uptime13.1 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '24 at 19:02
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 U 620
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.05 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
31% Below average
Memory 45.6
1-Core 43.5
2-Core 74
33% 54.4 Pts
4-Core 96.1
8-Core 96.9
13% 96.5 Pts
64-Core 92.7
6% 92.7 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31%
Great: 37%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
MSI(1462 8A96) 1GB
CLim: 1072 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 474.14
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.59% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 12
Parallax 10.9
6% 9.87 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 0.3
6% 8.17 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 5.59%
Great: 9%
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 1507) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.45% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.6 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 0.4
1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.45%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0712B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 69 15 90 109 63 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27% Poor
Read 240
Write 42.2
Mixed 7
SusWrite 86.5
20% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 2
31% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 54.1
DQ Mixed 0.5
21% 52.6 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 27%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM 15h Reserved
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 6.6
15% 5.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 5.1
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 3 60 23.5" 1920 1057 PHLC036 Philips 244E
Typical LIFEBOOK P770 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK P770

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 17% - Very poor Total price: $112
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback