Asus TUF B365-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 166%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics185% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B365-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210716
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '24 at 02:39
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 86.5
1-Core 131
2-Core 275
90% 164 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 694
79% 619 Pts
64-Core 695
43% 695 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$580
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4850 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
185% Outstanding
Lighting 249
Reflection 368
Parallax 291
203% 303 fps
MRender 363
Gravity 262
Splatting 192
214% 272 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 185%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 687 889 989 1037 970 641 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,276
Write 1,072
Mixed 1,123
SusWrite 869
244% 1,085 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 72.5
235% 81.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,340
DQ Write 844
DQ Mixed 972
757% 1,052 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 226%
Great: 435%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$190
683GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 383 438 453 457 458 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 427
Mixed 409
SusWrite 412
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 86.4
4K Mixed 46.8
164% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 360
270% 359 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 109%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.1% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 17.8
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 16.7
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 25 170 26.9" 1280 720 GBT270D M27Q
Typical TUF B365-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback