bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
Motherboard X99M-G
Memory122.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200812
Uptime2 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '24 at 02:20
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 2.00GHz
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 64.3
2-Core 129
56% 91.5 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 498
44% 374 Pts
64-Core 1,036
64% 1,036 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.5% Average
Lighting 53.4
Reflection 58.9
Parallax 74.7
44% 62.3 fps
MRender 59.1
Gravity 60.5
Splatting 43.9
44% 54.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
308GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1035 1042 1032 1042 1039 1034 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 1,023
Write 1,026
Mixed 951
SusWrite 1,037
228% 1,009 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 41.2
129% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 403
DQ Mixed 479
328% 398 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 161%
Great: 181%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40BB1-CRC 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.3% Good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 22.3
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 16.3
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 27" 1280 720 ACI27F4 ASUS VE276
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,464 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback