Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics73.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory19.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200814
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '24 at 01:36
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 140
2-Core 270
88% 162 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 320
43% 321 Pts
64-Core 311
19% 311 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 147A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (90 fps cap detected)
73.5% Very good
Lighting 90
Reflection 90
Parallax 90
73% 90 fps
MRender 90
Gravity 90
Splatting 90
74% 90 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,684
Write 3,159
Mixed 2,375
682% 3,073 MB/s
4K Read 68.6
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 80.6
298% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1321
DQ Write 1,011
DQ Mixed 1,116
848% 1,149 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 507%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 126 124 124 130 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 82.2
Write 107
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 126
71% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.7
188% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 110%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
24GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 40 42 54 50 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
32% Below average
Read 140
Write 121
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 46.1
98% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
30% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
OLOY CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 32
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 28.1
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 14: 0P 2R 0G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
14% 15% 39 51 11 60 27" 1920 1027 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,878 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,037
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback