Medion Erazer P6661 MD60494

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Medion Erazer P6661 MD60494 (all builds)
Motherboard	Medion D15SHN
Memory	6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180326
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '24 at 12:53
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6200U 135,462 User benchmarks, average bench 41% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	53.2% Above average	Memory 72.8 1-Core 72.9 2-Core 126 55% 90.4 Pts	4-Core 198 8-Core 192 26% 195 Pts	64-Core 196 12% 196 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M 38,813 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Device(1B0A 2281) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5152 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Lighting 20.5 Reflection 23.4 Parallax 17.3 17% 20.4 fps	MRender 11.6 Gravity 21.3 Splatting 15.5 13% 16.1 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 16%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD PHISON 256GB PS3110-S10C 522 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM01.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 289 166 180 234 288 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	70.5% Very good	Read 424 Write 370 Mixed 292 SusWrite 221 73% 327 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 47.3 4K Mixed 24.1 86% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 315 DQ Write 298 DQ Mixed 169 164% 260 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-YK0 Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 12GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 10.6 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 11.4 SC Mixed 11.1 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 96.3 42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	21	1	60	15.5"	1280 720	LGD04A7

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Erazer P6661 MD60494 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Medion Erazer P6661 MD60494

CPU
Core i5-6200UIntelBench 41%, 135,462 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 950MNvidiaBench 14%, 38,813 samples	1x

SSD
PHISON 256GB PS3110-S10CSSDBench 73%, 522 samples	1x

RAM
M471B1G73BH0-YK0 Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 12GBSamsungBench 35%, 44 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16