PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 85.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Hyrican PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | MSI H110M PRO-D (MS-7996) |
Memory | 24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170904 |
Uptime | 2.1 Days |
Run Date | Feb 13 '24 at 19:43 |
Run Duration | 180 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 32% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
76.7%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Gainward(10B0 1E07) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 551.23
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
32.6%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk S3 1T00 1TB
704GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 325 328 310 330 331 MB/s
|
85.6%
Excellent
|
|||
SSD 960GB
590GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 323 322 310 327 327 MB/s
|
43.2%
Average
|
|||
Intenso Sata III 2TB
119GB free
Firmware: V0609B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 297 297 282 231 239 MB/s
|
79.1%
Very good
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$59
345GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 113 114 113 113 MB/s
|
72.8%
Very good
|
|||
WD Elements 2620 5TB
3.5TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 95 94 95 93 MB/s
|
54.8%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A.C16FP 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
76.8%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 64 | 52 | 240 | 28.9" | 2560 1377 | SAM7058 LC32G7xT |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 153x |
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 102x |
Core i7-8700KIntel $180Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 88x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 103x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 72x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 67x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $319 |