HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8437
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201023
Uptime18.9 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '24 at 15:02
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 130
2-Core 256
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 647
67% 540 Pts
64-Core 812
50% 812 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
HP(103C 8439) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.2% Above average
Lighting 70
Reflection 106
Parallax 66.3
57% 80.8 fps
MRender 68.4
Gravity 68.1
Splatting 64.2
54% 66.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON SKC2000 250GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S2780101 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 318 231 343 181 324 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 2315
Write 1,108
Mixed 174
SusWrite 313
212% 977 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 61.2
205% 71.5 MB/s
DQ Read 657
DQ Write 476
DQ Mixed 309
300% 481 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 201%
Great: 269%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
586GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 151 152 147 154 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 161
Write 153
Mixed 31
SusWrite 151
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
804GB free
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 170 172 170 156 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 160
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 165
94% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 107%
WD Elements SE 25FE 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 25fe
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 76 78 78 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 112
Write 91
Mixed 65.3
SusWrite 77.8
113% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.4
155% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.8% Good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 21.1
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 21.8
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 8 217 60 60 24" 1920 1009 HPN337C HP 24o
Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx Builds (Compare 2,992 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $514
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback