Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics82.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201022
Uptime31.6 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '24 at 12:44
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$115
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 72.4
1-Core 132
2-Core 238
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 831
79% 655 Pts
64-Core 1,075
66% 1,075 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 81%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.6% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 109
Parallax 99.7
84% 104 fps
MRender 94.5
Gravity 100
Splatting 97.4
80% 97.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$68
309GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 464 464 466 402 425 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 476
Mixed 431
SusWrite 447
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 54.7
185% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 307
249% 352 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 122%
Great: 125%
BT58SSD13E 1TB
745GB free
Firmware: S1111H0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1613 1589 1617 1617 1617 1602 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 1,414
Write 1,400
Mixed 1,003
SusWrite 1,609
306% 1,356 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 25.5
209% 89.2 MB/s
DQ Read 887
DQ Write 816
DQ Mixed 488
466% 730 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 252%
Great: 249%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
562GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 173 176 173 175 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 184
Mixed 83
SusWrite 175
114% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 103%
Great: 113%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
251GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 72 73 74 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 60.4
Write 64.8
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 72.8
48% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20
94GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 89 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 77.4
Write 74.5
Mixed 52.6
SusWrite 88.9
54% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
65.5% Good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 25.4
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 24
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 100 24.1" 1280 720 SAM0F90 LC24RG50
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $742
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback