Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
Save results to profile Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics64.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 15 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 12 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 9 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0  (all builds)
Memory14.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '24 at 10:42
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 90.3
1-Core 124
2-Core 244
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 637
71% 560 Pts
64-Core 652
40% 652 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 89.3%
 Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
Zotac(19DA 5543)
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
64.3% Good
Lighting 84.6
Reflection 86.3
Parallax 75.1
69% 82 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 77.5
Splatting 61.5
55% 68.1 fps
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 64.3%
 Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SWORDFISH 250GB
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN2813
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 224 222 222 221 221 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 427
Write 226
Mixed 250
SusWrite 222
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 31
140% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 229
188% 272 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑
This bench: 85.6%
 Great: 233%
Adata SU630 240GB
222GB free
Firmware: S0423B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 72 63 7 38 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 509
Write 380
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 46.8
52% 237 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 0.1
42% 10.7 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 34.2%
 Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 24.5
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 36.7
SC Mixed 26.4
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 88.5%
 Great: 94%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 5 144 23.8" 1280 720 VSC0D39 XG2405
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-H310M M.2 2.0 Builds (Compare 1,598 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel  $115Bench 85%, 299,482 samples422x
Core i3-9100FIntel  $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples359x
Core i5-9400Intel  $134Bench 86%, 22,187 samples152x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples120x
GTX 1650Nvidia  $147Bench 43%, 259,091 samples89x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples77x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples139x
Green 240GB (2018)WD  $31Bench 45%, 156,194 samples51x
A400 480GBKingston  $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples50x
RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX  $69Bench 82%, 134,977 samples65x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples43x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples39x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback