Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200901
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '24 at 09:42
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 68.5
1-Core 134
2-Core 257
82% 153 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 828
80% 658 Pts
64-Core 1,072
66% 1,072 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$256
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 119
Parallax 124
109% 126 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 101
Splatting 89
88% 111 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX8100NP 512GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB421D57
SusWrite @10s intervals: 498 516 350 244 42 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 2,555
Write 431
Mixed 377
SusWrite 294
196% 914 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 99.8
4K Mixed 63.3
207% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 985
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 596
459% 644 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 214%
Great: 320%
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
769GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 95 97 96 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 87.3
Write 94.9
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 96.4
61% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 61%
WD WD20SPZX-11CRAT0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 116 114 115 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 108
Write 80.3
Mixed 65
SusWrite 115
68% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.8
172% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
PNY 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GTZB 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GTZB 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.2% Good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 25.4
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 26.8
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 53 144 23.8" 1920 1080 AOC2402 24G2W1G4
Typical TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II Builds (Compare 1,562 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback