Shuttle SZ270

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics70% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemShuttle SZ270  (all builds)
MotherboardShuttle FZ270
Memory51.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200417
Uptime5 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '24 at 09:42
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$152
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 132
2-Core 241
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 627
65% 525 Pts
64-Core 623
38% 623 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70% Good
Lighting 93.1
Reflection 90
Parallax 77.8
76% 87 fps
MRender 63.7
Gravity 79.2
Splatting 71.2
59% 71.4 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$75
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,647
Write 1,173
Mixed 568
248% 1,129 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 42.2
167% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 874
DQ Write 602
DQ Mixed 611
490% 696 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
61GB free
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 479
Write 450
Mixed 315
92% 415 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 38
134% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 152
168% 285 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 110%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
2GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 23.9
Write 5
Mixed 6.7
12% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.6
158% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
71% Very good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 22.6
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 22.7
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 26 6 120 32" 1280 720 DEL428C DELL G3223Q
Typical SZ270 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Shuttle SZ270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $334
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback