Acer Swift SFG16-71

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive575% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Swift SFG16-71  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL Lionfish_RTH
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB
Display3200 x 2000 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230427
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '24 at 09:41
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 68.1
1-Core 184
2-Core 332
102% 195 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 951
93% 764 Pts
64-Core 1,411
87% 1,411 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Acer(1025 169A) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
20% Very poor
Lighting 23.5
Reflection 30.3
Parallax 28.5
19% 27.4 fps
MRender 26.8
Gravity 31
Splatting 22.6
22% 26.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014 1TB
806GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73101100 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3853 3769 3720 3889 3869 3878 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
575% Outstanding
Read 4,231
Write 4,105
Mixed 2,400
SusWrite 3,830
818% 3,642 MB/s
4K Read 81.3
4K Write 219
4K Mixed 99.8
367% 133 MB/s
DQ Read 1588
DQ Write 1,100
DQ Mixed 1,274
970% 1,321 MB/s
Poor: 236%
This bench: 575%
Great: 574%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
130% Outstanding
MC Read 49.9
MC Write 53.5
MC Mixed 48.1
144% 50.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 50.9
SC Mixed 23.3
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 130%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 52 60 16" 1600 929 SDC418D
Typical Swift SFG16-71 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Acer Swift SFG16-71

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback