Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive63.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte B365 M AORUS ELITE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '24 at 08:32
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 87.5
1-Core 120
2-Core 239
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 564
67% 517 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
221GB free
Firmware: SBFKT1A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 467 463 464 461 461 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 394
Write 408
Mixed 358
SusWrite 462
92% 405 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 35.6
136% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 186
172% 260 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 100%
SSD 240GB 240GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0918A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 15 18 91 14 18 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 472
Write 393
Mixed 251
SusWrite 59.3
65% 294 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 81
4K Mixed 24
109% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 90.1
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 37.8
72% 136 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 10.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 12.5
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 40: 0P 3R 5G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
40% 28% 65 66 57 60 0" 1280 720
Typical GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 2,265 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $421
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback