Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '24 at 08:24
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$136
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 165
2-Core 265
98% 174 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 869
77% 652 Pts
64-Core 1,121
69% 1,121 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 254
Parallax 280
114% 225 fps
MRender 280
Gravity 232
Splatting 172
181% 228 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 129%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
742GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 32B2T6TA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2062
Write 1,415
Mixed 1,302
352% 1,593 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 71.4
253% 95.7 MB/s
DQ Read 985
DQ Write 875
DQ Mixed 516
500% 792 MB/s
Poor: 175% Great: 372%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
137GB free
Firmware: 32B3T8EA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,650
Write 1,957
Mixed 1,616
390% 1,741 MB/s
4K Read 63.1
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 90.9
312% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,190
DQ Write 1,041
DQ Mixed 647
613% 959 MB/s
Poor: 175% Great: 372%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
112GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 141
Write 68.7
Mixed 45.2
92% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.3
146% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G32C16U4BL.M16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 38.5
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 31.1
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 38.6
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 28.9" 1280 720 SAM7177 LS28AG700N
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,934 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $902
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback