Today's hottest deals

Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151028
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '24 at 08:18
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 88.1
2-Core 163
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 250
34% 251 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5500-$160
AMD(1002 0B0C) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.Q4
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.6% Average
Lighting 59.9
Reflection 67.4
Parallax 96.3
49% 74.5 fps
MRender 52.9
Gravity 65.9
Splatting 40.6
42% 53.1 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P190710b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 113 115 119 29 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 413
Write 124
Mixed 179
SusWrite 94.2
44% 203 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 25.2
92% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 49.1
DQ Write 41.1
DQ Mixed 66.4
44% 52.2 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$65
67GB free
Firmware: 13.01A13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 45 44 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 58.6
Write 56.9
Mixed 43.4
SusWrite 44.9
38% 50.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Transcend TS512MLK64V6N 8GB
1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.4% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.1
25% 8.87 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.2
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 75 21.5" 1920 1017 XMIA011 Redmi 215 NF
Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $930
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $315Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback