MSI Z370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B61)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics64.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B61
MotherboardMSI Z370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B61)  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '24 at 06:55
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$135
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 133
2-Core 265
90% 163 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 684
75% 596 Pts
64-Core 664
41% 664 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 551.23
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
64.1% Good
Lighting 53.1
Reflection 180
Parallax 164
43% 132 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 165
Splatting 101
105% 131 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB-$105
692GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 297 265 295 283 293 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 399
Write 346
Mixed 285
SusWrite 293
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 30.8
101% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 235
199% 291 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 108%
Samsung PSSD T7 Touch 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 312 320 344 293 339 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 273
Write 315
Mixed 288
SusWrite 320
68% 299 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 29.3
4K Mixed 19.2
61% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 194
141% 183 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 1TB-$105
393GB free
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 298 274 295 286 293 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 366
Write 355
Mixed 256
SusWrite 294
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 33.8
116% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 234
197% 286 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMUD440D82-3200D 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 41.9
MC Mixed 33.2
109% 38.1 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 43.1
SC Mixed 30
89% 31 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 34.1" 1280 720 GSM76FE LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical Z370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B61) Builds (Compare 7,486 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B61) - $125

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $613
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback