Gigabyte GA-Q87M-D2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Q87M-D2H  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140117
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '24 at 06:53
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$125
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 105
2-Core 210
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 516
54% 436 Pts
64-Core 530
33% 530 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$280
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 182
Reflection 177
Parallax 164
148% 174 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 142
Splatting 0.3
77% 109 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 119%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
764GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 896 494 301 688 495 496 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 82% Great: 137%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
99GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 108 108 111 120 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 122
Write 112
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 99.4
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 16.6
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 20.2
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.8" 1280 720 HPN366B HP 24mh
Typical GA-Q87M-D2H Builds (Compare 367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Q87M-D2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $283
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback