Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z790 AORUS ELITE AX ICE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 298%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 124%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 354%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 127%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics242% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive541% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z790 AORUS ELITE AX ICE  (all builds)
Memory56.7 GB free of 64 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '24 at 05:09
Run Duration322 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700KF-$260
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Memory 88.6
1-Core 218
2-Core 440
129% 249 Pts
4-Core 887
8-Core 1,642
151% 1,264 Pts
64-Core 3,196
198% 3,196 Pts
Poor: 121%
This bench: 127%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$728
Asus(1043 8935) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
242% Outstanding
Lighting 355
Reflection 344
Parallax 370
289% 356 fps
MRender 469
Gravity 296
Splatting 214
254% 326 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 242%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
APSFG-2T-CSUS 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.F.83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1621 4241 4969 4952 4982 5030 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
541% Outstanding
Read 2,595
Write 5,068
Mixed 3,014
SusWrite 4,299
853% 3,744 MB/s
4K Read 76.6
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 112
360% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 1,672
DQ Write 1,105
DQ Mixed 1,388
1,036% 1,388 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 541%
Great: 624%
APSFG-2T-CSUS 2TB
553GB free
Firmware: 3.2.F.83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3110 4713 4714 3955 1244 1122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
465% Outstanding
Read 2,600
Write 4,678
Mixed 2,837
SusWrite 3,143
753% 3,315 MB/s
4K Read 68.1
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 99.5
328% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,815
DQ Write 1,189
DQ Mixed 542
663% 1,182 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 465%
Great: 624%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$47
466GB free
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 460 451 441 439 422 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 467
Mixed 444
SusWrite 443
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 80.7
4K Mixed 51.7
167% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 129
157% 276 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 115%
Great: 125%
WD Purple 3TB (2014)-$79
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 144 144 144 146 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 143
Write 143
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 144
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$49
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 209 208 210 210 209 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 2BA30010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 109 109 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 106
Write 93.1
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 108
67% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 59%
Hitachi HTS725050A9A364 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: PC4OC72E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 99 100 98 99 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 97.8
Write 77
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 98.5
60% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
115% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6000C30 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
202% Outstanding
MC Read 82.3
MC Write 79.9
MC Mixed 77.1
228% 79.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 52.9
SC Mixed 35.2
106% 37.2 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 202%
Great: 260%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 27" 1920 1009 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical GA-Z790 AORUS ELITE AX ICE Builds (Compare 369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 299%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 126%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 377%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z790 AORUS ELITE AX ICE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $1,364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback