MSI MAG B650 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D75)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics163% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D75
MotherboardMSI MAG B650 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D75)  (all builds)
Memory20.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220914
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '24 at 04:43
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900-$369
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 73.4
1-Core 212
2-Core 420
120% 235 Pts
4-Core 812
8-Core 1,477
137% 1,144 Pts
64-Core 2554
158% 2554 Pts
Poor: 96%
This bench: 113%
Great: 119%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
Gigabyte(1458 408E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
163% Outstanding
Lighting 245
Reflection 222
Parallax 216
200% 228 fps
MRender 235
Gravity 156
Splatting 133
138% 175 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 163%
Great: 170%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$89
618GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620311WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,338
Write 4,618
Mixed 3,068
894% 4008 MB/s
4K Read 63
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 85.7
321% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 2005
DQ Write 1,593
DQ Mixed 1,793
1,343% 1,797 MB/s
Poor: 251% Great: 598%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX5U6000C4016G-CLARB 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
140% Outstanding
MC Read 53.7
MC Write 47.8
MC Mixed 49
143% 50.2 GB/s
SC Read 48.4
SC Write 54.8
SC Mixed 47.9
144% 50.4 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 140%
Great: 196%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27.2" 1280 720 BNQ7FA4 BenQ EX2710S
Typical MAG B650 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D75) Builds (Compare 738 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 217%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 220%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B650 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7D75)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $979
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback