Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 249%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 247%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics261% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211105
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '24 at 23:29
Run Duration315 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$247
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Memory 94.7
1-Core 141
2-Core 278
95% 171 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 950
91% 749 Pts
64-Core 1,508
93% 1,508 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$960
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
261% Outstanding
Lighting 376
Reflection 381
Parallax 466
306% 407 fps
MRender 515
Gravity 347
Splatting 251
290% 371 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 261%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,213
Write 464
Mixed 216
136% 631 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 40.9
129% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 197
152% 210 MB/s
Poor: 118% Great: 277%
Samsung MZ7LN512HMJP-000L7 512GB
3GB free
Firmware: MAV02L6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 474
Write 447
Mixed 396
98% 439 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 50.7
169% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 69% Great: 132%
Samsung HD103SJ 512GB
60GB free
Firmware: X4131002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 284 279 273 270 274 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 415
Write 299
Mixed 295
SusWrite 279
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 31.6
94% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 162
159% 255 MB/s
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
91GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 973 534 478 475 452 465 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 1,690
Write 1,319
Mixed 1,236
SusWrite 563
268% 1,202 MB/s
4K Read 52.9
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 70
232% 80.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,080
DQ Write 844
DQ Mixed 435
469% 786 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 217%
Great: 311%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
32GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 316 317 316 317 317 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 455
Mixed 435
SusWrite 319
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 52.5
176% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 355
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 109%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
78GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 106 104 102 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 176
Write 162
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 104
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
75GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 109 109 109 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 101
Write 59.6
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 109
63% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 112%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$88
102GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 90 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 87.1
Write 86.3
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 88.9
59% 80 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
198GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 131 130 133 130 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
77% Very good
Read 138
Write 126
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 130
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77%
Great: 112%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$88
527GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 90 90 89 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 108
Write 109
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 89.1
71% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$96
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 38.5
MC Mixed 29.2
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 42.4
SC Mixed 29.8
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 57.8
69% 57.8 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 51 120 31.5" 1280 720 AUS48E0 PG48UQ
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,723 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $330

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $1,177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback