Today's hottest deals

Medion MD35217

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemMedion MD35217  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B560H6-EM2
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211229
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '24 at 20:55
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400-$127
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 86.3
1-Core 149
2-Core 264
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 621
66% 526 Pts
64-Core 758
47% 758 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Zotac(19DA 9630) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 176
Parallax 165
149% 174 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 136
Splatting 119
117% 147 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 131%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane H10 with SSD 512GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.32
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 726
Write 858
Mixed 607
163% 730 MB/s
4K Read 79.3
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 51.5
232% 72.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,017
DQ Write 674
DQ Mixed 605
516% 765 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
564GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 161 165 164 164 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 149
Write 166
Mixed 32
SusWrite 163
92% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-XN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 31.6
98% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 26.9
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 52 240 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 27G2G8
Typical MD35217 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO

System: Medion MD35217

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $552
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback