Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory38 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '24 at 20:54
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$335
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 84.1
1-Core 145
2-Core 289
94% 173 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 1,098
99% 835 Pts
64-Core 2,308
143% 2,308 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 194
Parallax 189
147% 188 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 188
Splatting 126
121% 150 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 500GB
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 847 750 756 741 738 731 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Samsung 990 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 3B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3550 3652 3689 3691 3672 3674 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$49
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 537 554 584 542 596 614 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
108% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 38.8
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 34.6
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 60 31.5" 1280 720 AOC3201 Q32G1WG4
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,039 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $851
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback